Many women with breast cancer can skip chemo: study
A study has found that most women with the common form of
early-stage breast cancer can safely skip chemotherapy if genetic
testing is used to assess their risk.
Most
women with the most common form of early-stage breast cancer can safely
skip chemotherapy without hurting their chances of beating the disease,
says a landmark study that used genetic testing to gauge each patient's
risk.
The study is the largest ever
done of breast cancer treatment, and the results are expected to spare
up to 70,000 patients a year in the US and many more elsewhere the
ordeal and expense of these drugs.
The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute, some foundations and proceeds from the US breast cancer postage stamp and was published by the New England Journal of Medicine.
Cancer care has been evolving away from chemotherapy - older drugs with harsh side effects - in favour of gene-targeting therapies, hormone blockers and immune system treatments. When chemo is used now, it's sometimes for shorter periods or lower doses than it once was.
The breast cancer study focused on cases where chemo's value increasingly is in doubt: women with early-stage disease that has not spread to lymph nodes, is hormone-positive (meaning its growth is fuelled by estrogen or progesterone) and is not the type that the drug Herceptin targets.
The usual treatment is surgery followed by years of a hormone-blocking drug. But many women also are urged to have chemo to help kill any stray cancer cells. Doctors know that most don't need it, but evidence is thin on who can forgo it.
The study gave 10,273 patients a test called Oncotype DX, which uses a biopsy sample to measure the activity of genes involved in cell growth and response to hormone therapy, to estimate the risk that a cancer will recur.
About 17 percent of women had high-risk scores and were advised to have chemo. The 16 per cent with low-risk scores now know they can skip chemo, based on earlier results from this study.
The new results are on the 67 per cent of women at intermediate risk. All had surgery and hormone therapy, and half also got chemo.
After nine years, 94 per cent of both groups were still alive, and about 84 percent were alive without signs of cancer, so adding chemo made no difference.
Certain women 50 or younger did benefit from chemo; slightly fewer cases of cancer spreading far beyond the breast occurred among some of them given chemo, depending on their risk scores on the gene test.
All women like those in the study should get gene testing to guide their care, said Dr. Richard Schilsky, chief medical officer of the oncology society.
Associated Press
The impact is tremendous, said study leader, Dr Joseph Sparano of Montefiore Medical Centre in New York.
Most women in this situation don't need treatment beyond surgery and hormone therapy, he said.
The study was funded by the National Cancer Institute, some foundations and proceeds from the US breast cancer postage stamp and was published by the New England Journal of Medicine.
Cancer care has been evolving away from chemotherapy - older drugs with harsh side effects - in favour of gene-targeting therapies, hormone blockers and immune system treatments. When chemo is used now, it's sometimes for shorter periods or lower doses than it once was.
The breast cancer study focused on cases where chemo's value increasingly is in doubt: women with early-stage disease that has not spread to lymph nodes, is hormone-positive (meaning its growth is fuelled by estrogen or progesterone) and is not the type that the drug Herceptin targets.
The usual treatment is surgery followed by years of a hormone-blocking drug. But many women also are urged to have chemo to help kill any stray cancer cells. Doctors know that most don't need it, but evidence is thin on who can forgo it.
The study gave 10,273 patients a test called Oncotype DX, which uses a biopsy sample to measure the activity of genes involved in cell growth and response to hormone therapy, to estimate the risk that a cancer will recur.
About 17 percent of women had high-risk scores and were advised to have chemo. The 16 per cent with low-risk scores now know they can skip chemo, based on earlier results from this study.
The new results are on the 67 per cent of women at intermediate risk. All had surgery and hormone therapy, and half also got chemo.
After nine years, 94 per cent of both groups were still alive, and about 84 percent were alive without signs of cancer, so adding chemo made no difference.
Certain women 50 or younger did benefit from chemo; slightly fewer cases of cancer spreading far beyond the breast occurred among some of them given chemo, depending on their risk scores on the gene test.
All women like those in the study should get gene testing to guide their care, said Dr. Richard Schilsky, chief medical officer of the oncology society.
Associated Press
Posts
No comments
Thanks for viewing, your comments are appreciated.
Disclaimer: Comments on this blog are NOT posted by Olomoinfo, Readers are SOLELY responsible for their comments.
Need to contact us for gossips, news reports, adverts or anything?
Email us on; olomoinfo@gmail.com